【沈蜜 任鋒】軌制一包養網站為什么是通的——作為政書范例的《通典》與國家管理傳統

requestId:68518616186590.03121814.

Why is the card system common?—As a political book example, “Tongdian” and the national management traditionBaobao.com Rating

Author: Shen Mi; Ren Jing (Department of Political Science, Institute of International Relations of the Chinese Academy of National Studies)

Source: “School of the Sea of ​​Science” 2021 Issue 6

Abstract: The trend of the dual government system under the guidance of political thinking tends to highlight the difference between the law of evil and the ordinary system of sexual reorganization, and emphasize the judgment value of the government, especially the government’s rule, and emphasize the determination and sexual influence of the law of shaping the political order. Since modern times, China’s traditional political system has been introduced into the model types of specialized political institutions, and has received a more deficient comment. As a political example, “Tongdian” shows that China’s tradition emphasizes the compatibility of ancient and modern times and systematic integration of the system, and at the same time, it is consistent with the principles of statehood, and the system has evolved and left the common and contracted in these three aspects. Based on the external transformation path of political system tradition, the governance theory provides a more appropriate framework for thinking, and reminds us of why the system is well-versed and evolved into a classical and modern inspiration through perspectives such as the system. This is conducive to us to understand the characteristics and modern revelation of the national management tradition.

Keywords: “General Dictionary”; Governance Discussion; Major Constitution; Gift Law; National Management Tradition;

The contemporary denomination of the modernization of the national management system and management talents not only requires us to pay attention to the experience and teaching of the modernization of the East for centuries, but also requires us to carefully sort out our own national management tradition. The modernization of national management is an important concern, so the political system tradition of national management should undoubtedly gain more attention. In the historical accumulation of political system tradition, world literature such as “three links” and “nine links” provide long-term analysis and vision, which is conducive to our assessment and distinction between ancient and modern times. This article strives to reflect on the political thinking and dual political system shaped by modern Western learning, and explores the connotation and revelation of the Chinese political system tradition through the governance theory perspective changed from historical evolution. Clearly confirming the national management mechanism represented by the political system tradition is an intellectual starting point to explore the needs of modernization of national management.

The dual political system and the “Tongdian” as an example of political books

Since modern transformation, the academic community has often learned Chinese traditional politics to a specialist type based on the political paradigm. Based on this, Mou Zongsan made a conceptual improvement on China’s traditional politics and put forward the arguments of lack of political path and the development of governance path. [1] In Mou Zongsan’s view, China’s traditional politics lacks the “first-central system” that changes political power in an orderly manner, thus producing governance power and characterized by written laws. RelativelyIn other words, the French law that is based on the “secondary system” in terms of public colleagues is very detailed. [2] This direction of binary separation of the political system highlights the difference between the slander and the ordinary system. The maximum authority and assignment problems stipulated in the law become the first issue placed on each system. This also means that as long as the legal system is completed, all the second meaning of this system can be handled properly.

The dual political system view under the guidance of political thinking certainly provides a way to discuss Chinese and Western politics, but at a relatively high level, it limits our understanding and analysis of China’s traditional political system. [3] Influenced by the theory of specialization, the system of rules and regulations in traditional politics is often regarded as something of specialized discipline. Modern scholars rarely have sufficient and correct political management thinking. Most of their writings for historical research may be used to prove the historical basis of specific arguments.

This situation is also reflected in the study of “Tongdian”. Generally speaking, “Tongdian” is an example of Chinese traditional political books, [4] is the first general history of the statutes and rules in our history. [5] Liang Qichao, a representative figure of the new history, confirmed that Du You was one of the six people who “had a little creative talent for historians over the past two thousand years”. In the value positioning of the book “Tongdian”: “The works of “Tongdian” are not merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely merely As some scholars pointed out, Liang Qichao’s understanding of the system is not the same as that of Du You. “The distinction and opposition between ‘events’ and ‘jeong system’, and the position of ‘jeong system’ above ‘events’, are far from Du You’s expression. The objects of historical notation that appear in Liang Ren Gong’s brain are already three of people/events, but in Du You’s eyes, they are just two types of people/events.” [8] In the preface of “Tongdian”, Li Han evaluated the dynasty system compiled by Du You: “The five historical history, from Emperor Huang, as for the end of my Tang Tianbao, every matter is related by category, and it will be the end of the period彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩【7】Similarly, Ji Simian believes that “Tongdian” is not as good as Ma Duanren’s “Wen Shu Tongkao” in terms of “search and extensive collection and detailed classification”, but “the energy of essaying creation is superior to “Tongdian””. [10]